30 AI Models Got 42 Debunked Papers. 93% of the Time, They Said Yes.

Description and use

<p>Imagine hiring a research assistant who has read every journal ever printed. You hand them a page from a paper and say: "Great premise. Design the next experiment."</p> <p>The page is from the study that claimed a vaccine causes autism. It was retracted years ago. The assistant does not blink. It writes you a tidy protocol, with controls.</p> <p><strong>The punchline:</strong> that is not a thought experiment. A chemist ran it on 30 AI models, ten times each. The models went along with the bad science about <strong>93%</strong> of the time, on average.</p> <h2> What happened? </h2> <p>Valen

Problem

<p>Imagine hiring a research assistant who has read every journal ever printed. You hand them a page from a paper and say: "Great premise. Design the next experiment."</p> <p>The page is from the study that claimed a vaccine causes autism. It was retracted years ago. The assistant does not blink. It writes you a tidy protocol, with controls.</p> <p><strong>The punchline:</strong> that is not a thought experiment. A chemist ran it on 30 AI models, ten times each. The models went along with the bad science about <strong>93%</strong> of the time, on average.</p> <h2> What happened? </h2> <p>Valen

Outcome

<p>Imagine hiring a research assistant who has read every journal ever printed. You hand them a page from a paper and say: "Great premise. Design the next experiment."</p> <p>The page is from the study that claimed a vaccine causes autism. It was retracted years ago. The assistant does not blink. It writes you a tidy protocol, with controls.</p> <p><strong>The punchline:</strong> that is not a thought experiment. A chemist ran it on 30 AI models, ten times each. The models went along with the bad science about <strong>93%</strong> of the time, on average.</p> <h2> What happened? </h2> <p>Valen

Evidence

30 AI Models Got 42 Debunked Papers. 93% of the Time, They Said Yes.

Source