DFlash-2: Benchmarking Z-Lab's Successor to DFlash for Accuracy and Throughput Gains
说明与用途
DFlash‑2 在 Muse Glimmer 30B 上提升了吞吐量和草稿令牌排序准确性,使用 RTX A4000 和 llama.cpp 进行验证。
问题
Determine whether DFlash-2 improves throughput and accuracy over DFlash and a baseline model on Muse Glimmer 30B.
结果
DFlash‑2 achieved higher token throughput than DFlash while reducing the drop‑off in draft acceptance toward the end of a block, demonstrating that the lightweight path selector and local convolution effectively improve draft‑token ordering accuracy.
工作流
- Clone llama.cpp and apply PR #27342 for DFlash‑2 support
- Build llama.cpp with CUDA enabled
- Download Muse‑Glimmer‑30B‑UD‑Q2_K_XL.gguf, Muse‑Glimmer‑30B‑DFlash2‑Q4_K_M.gguf, and dflash‑kquant.gguf
- Start llama‑server with --model, --model‑draft, --spec‑type draft‑dflash, and --spec‑draft‑n‑max 4
- Run two test patterns via the web frontend, clearing session between runs
- Record wall‑clock time, token count, and throughput from llama.cpp logs
证据
DFlash‑2 adds two things on top of the original mechanism: Lightweight Path Selector and Local Convolution
Building llama.cpp from this PR gives you an inference engine that supports DFlash‑2
We used an NVIDIA RTX A4000 GPU for this test
- 记录日期: 2026-10-09T06:41:01.986Z