I Built an AI Judge That Doesn't Decide Who Wins

Описание и применение

FairJudge AI обеспечивает прозрачную и основанную на доказательствах оценку проектов в хакатонах, связывая баллы с доказательствами, выявляя недостающие данные, сравнивая судей и выявляя существенные разногласия, при этом оставляя окончательное решение за людьми.

Задача

Hackathon judges often give inconsistent scores because they interpret criteria differently, lack evidence, or emphasize different aspects of a project.

Результат

FairJudge AI standardizes scoring, increases transparency, and flags disagreements for human review, while keeping final decision with human judges.

Рабочий процесс

• Collect project and rubric
• Generate evidence-based AI evaluation
• Validate evidence
• Apply deterministic Python scoring
• Compare multiple judges
• Detect significant disagreements
• Recommend human review

Доказательства

FairJudge is an AI-assisted hackathon evaluation system designed to make judging more transparent, evidence-based, and consistent.

Источник

It can: Evaluate projects against a supplied rubric; Connect scores to supporting evidence; Identify missing evidence; Explain why a score was given; Compare multiple judges; Detect significant scoring disagreements; Recommend human review when judges disagree.

Источник

It does not decide who the objectively correct winner is. The final decision always remains with human judges.

Источник