I Built an AI Judge That Doesn't Decide Who Wins
说明与用途
FairJudge AI 为黑客松项目提供透明、基于证据的评分,将分数与证据关联,识别缺失证据,比较评委,检测重大分歧,并建议人工复核,同时将最终决策留给人工评委。
问题
Hackathon judges often give inconsistent scores because they interpret criteria differently, lack evidence, or emphasize different aspects of a project.
结果
FairJudge AI standardizes scoring, increases transparency, and flags disagreements for human review, while keeping final decision with human judges.
工作流
- Collect project and rubric
- Generate evidence-based AI evaluation
- Validate evidence
- Apply deterministic Python scoring
- Compare multiple judges
- Detect significant disagreements
- Recommend human review
证据
FairJudge is an AI-assisted hackathon evaluation system designed to make judging more transparent, evidence-based, and consistent.
It can: Evaluate projects against a supplied rubric; Connect scores to supporting evidence; Identify missing evidence; Explain why a score was given; Compare multiple judges; Detect significant scoring disagreements; Recommend human review when judges disagree.
It does not decide who the objectively correct winner is. The final decision always remains with human judges.
- 记录日期: 2026-10-04T19:40:44.823Z