Loading page...Загружаем страницу...正在加载页面...
AtlasRepo

I Built an AI Judge That Doesn't Decide Who Wins

说明与用途

FairJudge AI 为黑客松项目提供透明、基于证据的评分,将分数与证据关联,识别缺失证据,比较评委,检测重大分歧,并建议人工复核,同时将最终决策留给人工评委。

问题

Hackathon judges often give inconsistent scores because they interpret criteria differently, lack evidence, or emphasize different aspects of a project.

结果

FairJudge AI standardizes scoring, increases transparency, and flags disagreements for human review, while keeping final decision with human judges.

工作流

  • Collect project and rubric
  • Generate evidence-based AI evaluation
  • Validate evidence
  • Apply deterministic Python scoring
  • Compare multiple judges
  • Detect significant disagreements
  • Recommend human review

证据

FairJudge is an AI-assisted hackathon evaluation system designed to make judging more transparent, evidence-based, and consistent.

来源

It can: Evaluate projects against a supplied rubric; Connect scores to supporting evidence; Identify missing evidence; Explain why a score was given; Compare multiple judges; Detect significant scoring disagreements; Recommend human review when judges disagree.

来源

It does not decide who the objectively correct winner is. The final decision always remains with human judges.

来源

  • 记录日期: 2026-10-04T19:40:44.823Z