I fact-checked 5 viral "my AI bot made money" posts against primary data. None survived.

Описание и применение

Автор проверил пять вирусных постов о прибыльных AI‑ботах и доказал, что они недостоверны, предложив систематический метод проверки и надёжную альтернативу.

Задача

Viral claims of AI bots generating large profits from small investments are often unverified and misleading.

Результат

All five viral posts were found to lack verifiable evidence, had unrealistic fee structures, or were impossible to execute. The author demonstrated a repeatable verification framework and offered a proven, low‑risk trend‑following strategy as an alternative.

Рабочий процесс

• 1. Identify the claim and gather the post details.
• 2. Check for verifiable evidence such as a public wallet or trade history.
• 3. Verify any referral links or paid group offers.
• 4. Calculate if the starting balance can place at least one trade given stated fees.
• 5. Assess if the implied daily return is realistic and repeatable.
• 6. Cross‑check on-chain pool data, fee schedules, and official project sites.
• 7. Document findings and publish a transparent analysis.

Доказательства

All three profit‑claim posts fail on points 1 and 2 alone.

The post links a trading app referral twice. That app's referral programme pays the referrer up to 25% of referees' trading fees.

Dry‑run mode, the real model, 143,535 fills: realised PnL of about minus $144, which the dashboard shows as minus 299% of its reference capital.