I made AI coding agents race each other, and the fast one wasn't the one I expected
说明与用途
作者创建了 Agent Derby,允许在同一任务上并行比较 AI 代码代理。最快的代理在 17 秒内完成,但功能最丰富的代理耗时 2½ 分钟。实验表明速度不一定等于整体质量。
问题
Choosing the best AI coding agent based on benchmarks that may not reflect real-world performance.
结果
The fastest agent (Sonnet 5.5) completed the snake game in 17 s, but the most feature‑rich and cost‑effective agent (Opus 5.5) produced a richer game in 2½ min. The race revealed that speed does not equal overall quality.
工作流
- 1. Type a task and select agents to race.
- 2. Each agent receives the same prompt simultaneously.
- 3. Agents run in isolated sandboxes, preventing interference.
- 4. Real-time view shows each agent’s file edits, terminal output, clock, token usage, and cost.
- 5. When an agent finishes, its built artifact launches automatically (web app in frame, terminal app in terminal).
- 6. Results are displayed in a comparison table with ranking, cost, and token metrics.
- 7. Optionally keep a result as a new branch or folder; no automatic merging.
证据
Every few days someone tells me which coding agent is "obviously the best".
I typed "build a playable snake game in the browser", picked three Claude models, and hit start.
Sonnet 5.5 was finished in 17 seconds.
Opus built a start screen, sound effects, a pause button and a mute key. It wrote about six times as much code.
If an agent's CLI doesn't report a number, the app says "not reported".
- 记录日期: 2026-10-05T08:41:07.770Z