MonkeyCode's Free Tier vs. Self-Hosting: A Decision Matrix and Probe Script

说明与用途

团队应通过测量延迟、吞吐量和补丁可用性，客观比较 MonkeyCode 的免费托管版与自托管版，以避免隐藏成本和支持问题。

问题

Teams struggle to decide whether to use a managed free tier or self-host an AI coding agent, balancing cost, latency, data privacy, and operational burden.

结果

Teams can objectively compare managed free tier and self‑hosted options, avoiding hidden costs and ensuring reliable performance.

工作流

• 1. Identify workload shape (interactive vs batch).
• 2. Assess data boundary requirements (third‑party vs internal).
• 3. Evaluate operational tax (maintenance vs none).
• 4. Use the decision matrix to shortlist options.
• 5. Run tier_probe.sh against both endpoints to collect TTFT, tokens/sec, and HTTP status.
• 6. Run patch_check.sh to verify patch applicability.
• 7. Analyze median results and patch acceptance rate.
• 8. Decide on managed free tier, paid tier, or self‑hosting based on metrics and constraints.

证据

The probe catches speed and basic correctness. It does not catch the operational surprises.

来源

The matrix compresses the tradeoffs, but it does not replace measurement.

来源