Moving Beyond LLM Hallucinations in Structural Engineering via MCP

Description and use

<p>If you ask a large language model to calculate the geometry of a staircase, you are playing a dangerous game with probability. An LLM might give you a response that sounds authoritative and follows the correct cadence of architectural reasoning, but it is fundamentally predicting tokens, not executing geometric constraints. In structural engineering—where adherence to International Residential Code (IRC) or International Building Code (IBC) isn't just a suggestion but a legal mandate—this probabilistic approach is a liability.</p> <p>The core issue isn't the LLM's knowledge of math; it is t

Problem

<p>If you ask a large language model to calculate the geometry of a staircase, you are playing a dangerous game with probability. An LLM might give you a response that sounds authoritative and follows the correct cadence of architectural reasoning, but it is fundamentally predicting tokens, not executing geometric constraints. In structural engineering—where adherence to International Residential Code (IRC) or International Building Code (IBC) isn't just a suggestion but a legal mandate—this probabilistic approach is a liability.</p> <p>The core issue isn't the LLM's knowledge of math; it is t

Outcome

<p>If you ask a large language model to calculate the geometry of a staircase, you are playing a dangerous game with probability. An LLM might give you a response that sounds authoritative and follows the correct cadence of architectural reasoning, but it is fundamentally predicting tokens, not executing geometric constraints. In structural engineering—where adherence to International Residential Code (IRC) or International Building Code (IBC) isn't just a suggestion but a legal mandate—this probabilistic approach is a liability.</p> <p>The core issue isn't the LLM's knowledge of math; it is t

Evidence

Moving Beyond LLM Hallucinations in Structural Engineering via MCP

Source