My Book Ad Ended Up Under a Housing-Market Post
说明与用途
一个自动化的Claude Code代理生成卡片并发布到博客,但由于主题循环和重复检查规则,AI 代码设置的脚注出现在关于住房市场的帖子下,导致受众不匹配。解决方案是在卡片生成前进行重叠检查,并使用测量过的写作池作为后备,以防止此类错误。
问题
An AI‑generated blog post’s footnote about an AI coding agent appeared under a housing‑market headline, reaching the wrong audience.
结果
The updated pipeline prevents footnotes from appearing under unrelated headlines by aligning upstream and downstream overlap checks and providing a fallback topic pool.
工作流
- 1. Card writer generates a card with topic and footnote.
- 2. Card writer validates card structure and forbidden content.
- 3. Card writer checks 30‑day overlap against its own history and the blog agent’s overlap logic (imported read‑only).
- 4. If overlap, card writer skips the story; if all three are blocked, it selects from a pool of measured write‑ups.
- 5. Blog agent receives the card, posts the topic (or swapped topic) and footnote unchanged.
- 6. If the card writer’s fallback selects a new topic, the blog agent posts it with the original footnote.
- 7. If all topics are blocked, the card writer falls back to the old behavior, producing a post with the original topic and footnote.
证据
The card writer had only three stories to choose from, rotated by date. So the same three topics came back every three days.
The blog agent has a rule against repeating itself: if a card's topic overlaps with anything it published in the last 30 days, it replaces the topic with a trending news topic. It does not touch the footnote.
The card writer now asks the question before the blog agent does.
If the three original stories are all blocked, it draws from a pool of 68 short write-ups of things the agent actually measured while running.
- 记录日期: 2026-10-01T05:08:01.049Z