n8n vs Make.com: Which Automation Tool Actually Wins

Описание и применение

Автор сравнивает n8n и Make.com, показывая, что Make.com быстрее и проще для простых задач, но дороже при масштабировании, тогда как n8n обеспечивает гибкость, прозрачные цены и контроль над инфраструктурой, подходя для сложных автоматизаций.

Задача

Choosing the right workflow automation platform between n8n and Make.com for different complexity levels and budgets.

Результат

Found that Make.com excels in speed and ease for simple tasks but can become costly; n8n offers greater flexibility, transparent pricing, and self‑hosting for complex workflows, making it cheaper at scale.

Рабочий процесс

• 1. Identify workflow complexity and need for custom code.
• 2. Evaluate budget and pricing model (operations vs per execution).
• 3. Consider user experience and learning curve.
• 4. Choose Make.com for quick, visual tasks or n8n for complex, custom logic.
• 5. Deploy chosen platform, monitor costs, and iterate.

Доказательства

Make.com is the more polished, intuitive platform… I could build a workflow in 15 minutes that would've taken me an hour to research on n8n.

Источник

I once hit $200 in overage charges because a workflow ran more often than I expected.

Источник

n8n wins here decisively. You can write custom Node.js code… I once needed to manipulate JSON data… n8n's code node solved it in five minutes.

Источник