ProofDesk: A contact review is only as current as its evidence

Description and use

ProofDesk shows that withdrawing evidence invalidates prior claim approvals while preserving review history.

Problem

When supporting evidence for an approved claim becomes unusable, the claim’s approval must be invalidated while preserving its review history.

Outcome

ProofDesk demonstrates that withdrawing evidence invalidates prior approvals while preserving review history, ensuring claim freshness without altering cloud data.

Workflow

• Load original Sanity evidence‑history view
• Select a claim and review its evidence
• Approve a claim based on current evidence
• Withdraw the evidence source and record a withdrawal reason
• Observe that the claim’s approval status reverts to pending and the previous review remains in history

Evidence

ProofDesk explores a small question: what should happen to an approved claim when its supporting evidence stops being usable?

Source

Record a reason for reviewing the first number, then withdraw its source: the earlier review becomes invalid while its history remains.

Source

The app does not discover or authenticate them, fetch the referenced websites, dial a number, or establish who would answer a call.

Source

The original Sanity view retains its independently exercised cloud sequence: a broad “All formats are supported” claim was narrowed to “Verified for UTF-8 CSV,” approved, and then put back under review by withdrawing the evidence.

Source