The stash that would have deleted the work it was protecting

说明与用途

在长期共享的 checkout 中使用 git stash 导致未提交的工作因 reference‑transaction 钩子阻止 stash 而被丢失。已移除 stash 方案，改为提交脏文件并创建调查任务。

问题

Using git stash in a long‑lived, shared checkout caused a hard reset to discard uncommitted work when a reference‑transaction hook blocked stashes.

结果

The stash‑based heal was unsafe; the hook caused a hard reset to lose work. Removing the stash logic and committing dirty files instead prevented data loss and surfaced hidden changes.

工作流

• 1. Check if tree is dirty and main diverged.
• 2. Attempt to stash with git stash push --include-untracked (blocked by hook).
• 3. Replay local commits onto origin/main; if fails, reset hard to origin/main.
• 4. If stash succeeded, pop it; if pop fails, reset to HEAD.
• 5. In new logic: commit dirty tree, raise investigation task, push changes.

证据

Since June, a reference‑transaction hook in it refuses every write to refs/stash. Stashes are banned there

来源

The step meant to keep the work safe is exactly the step that, when it fails, leaves the work in the path of a hard reset.

来源

The lane’s start‑of‑run flush commits the stranded files with a path‑scoped commit, and the next cycle heals.

来源