We tested 4 AI app builders with the same prompt. Here’s what broke.

说明与用途

作者比较了四个免费 AI 应用构建器，测试了多用户待办应用的数据隔离功能。所有构建器都通过了功能测试，但 Bolt 在移动端仅显示悬停按钮，Base44 缺少登录恢复，v0 需要繁琐的手动设置，Lovable 的密码最短为 6 位。

问题

Assess how free‑plan AI app builders handle a multi‑user to‑do app with data isolation and usability on mobile.

结果

All four builders achieved perfect functional scores, but Bolt had mobile hover‑only buttons, Base44 lacked login recovery and token revocation, v0 required 15 min of manual setup, and Lovable had a 6‑character password minimum.

工作流

• 1. Provide prompt: "A multi‑user to‑do app with sign‑up and login, a database where each user sees only their own tasks, and a public URL."
• 2. Run each builder on its free plan.
• 3. Execute 10 automated feature checks with Playwright, a phone‑width check, and a cross‑user visibility test.
• 4. Record score, build time, cost, and any functional issues.
• 5. Summarize findings and lessons learned.

证据

We kept seeing "best AI app builder" lists with no evidence behind them. So we gave Lovable, Bolt, Base44 and v0 the exact same prompt on their free plans:

来源

Then we checked what each tool built. We ran 10 automated feature checks with Playwright, a phone-width check and a cross-user test: can user B see user A's to-dos?

来源

None of them leaked data. User B never saw user A's to-dos in any of the four apps.

来源

Bolt: on a phone, the edit and delete buttons appear only on mouse hover, so touch users can't see them.

来源

Base44: if a new user closes the email-code page, the login screen offers no way to get back to it or resend the code. Logout also didn't revoke the token on the server.

来源

v0: setup took about 15 minutes and 6 manual steps: accept the terms, install Neon, approve SQL twice, generate an auth secret and publish by hand.

来源

Lovable: our checks found no functional bugs. The only nit is the 6-character password minimum.

来源

The useful signal is in the failures. Demos never show hover-only buttons, dead-end login screens or setup friction.

来源