When AI must not act alone: human-in-the-loop patterns for security automation

Description and use

<p>Most of the AI security work we do for clients ends up hinging on one question: what is this thing allowed to do on its own at 3am on a Sunday?</p> <p>Everything else follows from the answer. Model choice, prompt design, which vendor's agent framework you use, all of it matters less than where you draw the line between an action the system takes and an action a person takes. This post closes out <a href="https://picnet.com.au/blog/practical-ai-in-cyber-security-the-series/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Practical AI in Cyber Security</a> with the governance layer that the earlier posts assumed

Problem

<p>Most of the AI security work we do for clients ends up hinging on one question: what is this thing allowed to do on its own at 3am on a Sunday?</p> <p>Everything else follows from the answer. Model choice, prompt design, which vendor's agent framework you use, all of it matters less than where you draw the line between an action the system takes and an action a person takes. This post closes out <a href="https://picnet.com.au/blog/practical-ai-in-cyber-security-the-series/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Practical AI in Cyber Security</a> with the governance layer that the earlier posts assumed

Outcome

<p>Most of the AI security work we do for clients ends up hinging on one question: what is this thing allowed to do on its own at 3am on a Sunday?</p> <p>Everything else follows from the answer. Model choice, prompt design, which vendor's agent framework you use, all of it matters less than where you draw the line between an action the system takes and an action a person takes. This post closes out <a href="https://picnet.com.au/blog/practical-ai-in-cyber-security-the-series/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Practical AI in Cyber Security</a> with the governance layer that the earlier posts assumed

Evidence

When AI must not act alone: human-in-the-loop patterns for security automation

Source