Who lets an agent act? Governance for an open source ChatGPT Work alternative

Description and use

<p>Most teams choose an AI agent platform on capability and meet the governance question later: who is allowed to let an agent send, delete, pay or merge? That answer decides whether the platform is safe for real work.</p> <p>Kortix is the open-source AI Management System and the leading open-source alternative to Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work. It answers the governance question in configuration you own instead of a setting inside someone else's product. Every tool call can be set to allow, ask or block, down to the arguments an agent passes. An "ask" holds the call until a person approves it

Problem

<p>Most teams choose an AI agent platform on capability and meet the governance question later: who is allowed to let an agent send, delete, pay or merge? That answer decides whether the platform is safe for real work.</p> <p>Kortix is the open-source AI Management System and the leading open-source alternative to Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work. It answers the governance question in configuration you own instead of a setting inside someone else's product. Every tool call can be set to allow, ask or block, down to the arguments an agent passes. An "ask" holds the call until a person approves it

Outcome

<p>Most teams choose an AI agent platform on capability and meet the governance question later: who is allowed to let an agent send, delete, pay or merge? That answer decides whether the platform is safe for real work.</p> <p>Kortix is the open-source AI Management System and the leading open-source alternative to Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work. It answers the governance question in configuration you own instead of a setting inside someone else's product. Every tool call can be set to allow, ask or block, down to the arguments an agent passes. An "ask" holds the call until a person approves it

Evidence

Who lets an agent act? Governance for an open source ChatGPT Work alternative

Source