Why your AI coding agent forgets team decisions (and what to store instead)

Description and use

<h1> Why your AI coding agent forgets team decisions (and what to store instead) </h1> <p>Teams running Cursor and Claude Code side by side hit the same wall.</p> <p><code>CLAUDE.md</code> works for one seat. It does not carry decisions across seats. One agent learns why you dropped Redis. Another suggests Redis tomorrow.</p> <p>Rules files are static. Team context is not.</p> <h2> The bottleneck moved </h2> <p>Model quality jumped. Shared context did not.</p> <p>What still burns time every week:</p> <ul> <li>Re-explaining the same architecture tradeoff at the start of a session</li> <li>Switc

Problem

<h1> Why your AI coding agent forgets team decisions (and what to store instead) </h1> <p>Teams running Cursor and Claude Code side by side hit the same wall.</p> <p><code>CLAUDE.md</code> works for one seat. It does not carry decisions across seats. One agent learns why you dropped Redis. Another suggests Redis tomorrow.</p> <p>Rules files are static. Team context is not.</p> <h2> The bottleneck moved </h2> <p>Model quality jumped. Shared context did not.</p> <p>What still burns time every week:</p> <ul> <li>Re-explaining the same architecture tradeoff at the start of a session</li> <li>Switc

Outcome

<h1> Why your AI coding agent forgets team decisions (and what to store instead) </h1> <p>Teams running Cursor and Claude Code side by side hit the same wall.</p> <p><code>CLAUDE.md</code> works for one seat. It does not carry decisions across seats. One agent learns why you dropped Redis. Another suggests Redis tomorrow.</p> <p>Rules files are static. Team context is not.</p> <h2> The bottleneck moved </h2> <p>Model quality jumped. Shared context did not.</p> <p>What still burns time every week:</p> <ul> <li>Re-explaining the same architecture tradeoff at the start of a session</li> <li>Switc

Evidence

Why your AI coding agent forgets team decisions (and what to store instead)

Source