Your prompt won't fix AI-sounding writing. A lint rule will.

Description and use

<p>I generate a fair amount of technical writing with models. For a long time I kept getting the same reaction from readers, and it took me too long to name it properly.</p> <p>The posts were not wrong. They were tiring.</p> <p>The failure had a shape. A section would open by announcing why the topic mattered before it said anything about the topic. A list would arrive as a column of bold labels, each followed by a colon and a restatement of the label. A section would end by hedging — "it is worth keeping in mind that..." — and commit to nothing.</p> <p>None of that is a factual error. All of

Problem

<p>I generate a fair amount of technical writing with models. For a long time I kept getting the same reaction from readers, and it took me too long to name it properly.</p> <p>The posts were not wrong. They were tiring.</p> <p>The failure had a shape. A section would open by announcing why the topic mattered before it said anything about the topic. A list would arrive as a column of bold labels, each followed by a colon and a restatement of the label. A section would end by hedging — "it is worth keeping in mind that..." — and commit to nothing.</p> <p>None of that is a factual error. All of

Outcome

<p>I generate a fair amount of technical writing with models. For a long time I kept getting the same reaction from readers, and it took me too long to name it properly.</p> <p>The posts were not wrong. They were tiring.</p> <p>The failure had a shape. A section would open by announcing why the topic mattered before it said anything about the topic. A list would arrive as a column of bold labels, each followed by a colon and a restatement of the label. A section would end by hedging — "it is worth keeping in mind that..." — and commit to nothing.</p> <p>None of that is a factual error. All of

Evidence

Your prompt won't fix AI-sounding writing. A lint rule will.

Source